Ex-Apopka Wastewater Employee Files Whistleblower Suit

Ex-Apopka Wastewater Employee Files Whistleblower Suit

Former Apopka employee Glen Brooks, fired in 2015 apparently for lying, has actually submitted a whistleblower suit in federal court, declaring he was dismissed for raising issues about possibly hazardous conditions at the city’s wastewater plant.

The center, integrated in 1972, was discovered in offense of more than a lots guidelines in December after a two-day evaluation by the state Department of Environmental Protection.

Brooks is represented in the federal suit by Frank Kruppenbacher, a lawyer with Morgan & Morgan who worked as among the most relied on consultants to previous Mayor John Land for 30 years.

The suit declares Mayor Joe Kilsheimer, who beat Land in 2014 and did not keep Kruppenbacher as city lawyer, conspired with administrative officer Glenn Irby and 2 other managers to “conceal and break the law regarding the unlawful conduct and hazardous conditions …” at the water treatment plant.

The six-page grievance, submitted in federal court in Orlando, likewise declares they wrongly implicated Brooks of lying.

Kilsheimer, dealing with a re-election difficulty from Orange County Commissioner Bryan Nelson, stated the city will not talk about pending litigation.

Previously this year, continuous issues at the treatment center required Apopka to stop accepting wastewater from Anuvia Plant Nutrients, a fertilizer company that opened a $100 million production operation with guarantees the city might process its discharge.

The city action required the factory to close briefly while it looked for options to process wastewater.

Inning accordance with the claim, Brooks consistently alerted his Apopka managers of unlawful contamination and allow infractions at the wastewater treatment plant, where he worked for 14 years.

He declared the conditions presented physical and mental damage to staff members operating at the plant and presented a risk to public health and security.

A state evaluation concluded the ecological damage from the plant was small but undesirable. The city preserves the plant’s issues posture no instant public health risk.

But specialists employed by the city in January to study the wastewater plant discovered issues in its operations, upkeep, management and administration.

In an interview last month, Kilsheimer stated the city must have updated the treatment center more than a years earlier when state lawmakers authorized the 2004 Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act.

The law, which required a raised interstate through the environmentally vulnerable Wekiva River basin, likewise enforced more rigid guidelines for neighboring wastewater processors, both public and independently run.

A city reality sheet on the wastewater plant traces the centers issues to age, wear and tear and disregard.

The suit looks for back spend for Brooks, who was fired Sept. 26 from his supervisory post, and undefined damages. It likewise requires the city pay Brooks’ lawyer charges.

The claim likewise looks for damages for libel for the city’s claims that Brooks had not informed the reality to managers who questioned him last summer season.

Comments are closed.